CJ99X
New Member
Ever think this could be the EPAs way of slamming doors on third party programmers? I have wondered about this recall since it goes all the way back for vehicles that are equipped with even older generation ECUs?
Yep - isn't there a ban on selling vehicles with open recalls? And marking recalls complete is an electronic automatic process...so a "friendly" tech may not be able to fudge it. Couple years back I just realized that my current truck is going to have to last a long time, and will be un-sellable through a dealer network of any kind...Ever think this could be the EPAs way of slamming doors on third party programmers? I have wondered about this recall since it goes all the way back for vehicles that are equipped with even older generation ECUs?
seems to be a Cummins thing. No mention of powerstroke or duramaxEver think this could be the EPAs way of slamming doors on third party programmers? I have wondered about this recall since it goes all the way back for vehicles that are equipped with even older generation ECUs?
"Yet". It was only a VW/Bosch thing a decade ago.seems to be a Cummins thing. No mention of powerstroke or duramax
Did they pay California because CA was the one that sued? Or did CARB do the research to find the "device"? Can you link more info?SO they paid California in this fiasco, does that mean that trucks were not meeting California requirements only?...They have their own set of goofy emissions requirements that dont apply in the rest of the country.
GM (Isuzu) and Ford may be next maybe we haven't heard their stories as of yet. I was just thinking the way the fed works, heck they have spent the last few years going after "defeat" dealers and now saying private citizens cannot legally sell deleted vehicles who knows where these "unelected" nazis will land next.seems to be a Cummins thing. No mention of powerstroke or duramax
I am willing to bet under the new regs imposed in CA that they may of caught whatever we are seeing and reported it to the EPA if it actually is a backdoorDid they pay California because CA was the one that sued? Or did CARB do the research to find the "device"? Can you link more info?
these things do tend to take a very long time to drag out for sure. Heck look how long it took them to recall C series Chevrolets that were burning people alive in side impacts and that was the NHTSA who "reacts" quickly"Yet". It was only a VW/Bosch thing a decade ago.
Regulatory bodies regularly work similar "cases" against similar entities. What you're seeing is the end result, the settlement, the recall, and the news release...
How long was that case in work? Months? Years? Gov't employees are in their position for long periods of time, and they can milk a project for decades until retirement. Budget wise- 1.X billion dollars amounts to nothing in the US budget, but it's a heck of a statement on an annual personnel appraisal form. And I"m sure there's a form. Bureaucracies can't live without forms....
And that the NHTSA - this here is a DOJ settlment...how many automotive engineers work there? 0 point 0?these things do tend to take a very long time to drag out for sure. Heck look how long it took them to recall C series Chevrolets that were burning people alive in side impacts and that was the NHTSA who "reacts" quickly
The same amount that work at the CPSC but when a crib gets recalled no one cries about beauracratsAnd that the NHTSA - this here is a DOJ settlment...how many automotive engineers work there? 0 point 0?
Isuzu doesn't have anything to do with the Duramax anymore. GM bought them out a couple of years ago.GM (Isuzu) and Ford may be next maybe we haven't heard their stories as of yet. I was just thinking the way the fed works, heck they have spent the last few years going after "defeat" dealers and now saying private citizens cannot legally sell deleted vehicles who knows where these "unelected" nazis will land next.
Looks like May of 2022 so this generation of engine is still I would say Isuzu designedIsuzu doesn't have anything to do with the Duramax anymore. GM bought them out a couple of years ago.
Motortred had an article stating LML and newer were 100% GM designed and Isuzu involvement stopped in 2010 ( it was just financial after that).Looks like May of 2022 so this generation of engine is still I would say Isuzu designed
I think gale Banks stated that on a video at one point as wellMotortred had an article stating LML and newer were 100% GM designed and Isuzu involvement stopped in 2010 ( it was just financial after that).
Ever think this could be the EPAs way of slamming doors on third party programmers? I have wondered about this recall since it goes all the way back for vehicles that are equipped with even older generation ECUs?
I am speculating that they are slamming all doors since they went after the delete companies in the past couple of years. Who actually knows until the repair comes out as to what the issues were with the EPA. I think we lost the diesel in 2007 as they keep taking an already efficient engine and wasting fuel to "clean it up"How so?
There's a new rumor running again about it "locking ECU (correctly a PCM on a Cummins)" which is just not true. At least one person has already reported a tune flash after the 67A recall on a 2014.
Wonder if part of their issue with emissions is that wonky system they use by injecting late in the exhaust cycle where some is burned in the engine the rest makes its way to the DOC to create the heat for the dpf burn off.I am speculating that they are slamming all doors since they went after the delete companies in the past couple of years. Who actually knows until the repair comes out as to what the issues were with the EPA. I think we lost the diesel in 2007 as they keep taking an already efficient engine and wasting fuel to "clean it up"